Anthropic accused of ‘secret sabotage’ as Claude Fable 5 silently limits capabilities for AI researchers and developers

When Anthropic made its first Mythos-tier model available to the general public yesterday, called Claude Fable 5, Fortune reported it was a “considerable step” for the lab, coming just over a week after the company confidentially filed for IPO paperwork. It had initially deemed Mythos-class models too dangerous to release, citing their significantly enhanced ability to identify software vulnerabilities, but said it was now confident new guardrails in Claude Fable 5 are enough to ensure these dangerous skills don’t fall into the wrong hands.

Just hours after the model’s release, however, major backlash from AI researchers, developers, and policy experts began brewing on social media. The pushback centered around a paragraph buried in Claude Fable 5’s 319-page system card—a document that offers detailed safety disclosures—which revealed that Fable would quietly downgrade its own responses when it detected requests related to cutting-edge AI development work, such as building the infrastructure used to train large AI models.

In practice, that means a user could ask Fable for help, receive a deliberately weakened answer, but not know the model was holding anything back. Critics made it clear they felt this undermined a basic expectation that a tool would either...